Page 2 of 2
Posted: 10 Oct 2005 15:44
by Hyronymus
The issue with 'people' always is and always will be that some of them expect less-important, irrelevant or impossible things. By no means does that require 'us' to meet all the people's demands. Instead 'we', the in-crowd should select the relevant ones and give that our full attention.
Posted: 13 Nov 2006 22:35
by Hyronymus
Double post, there is so little decided about the pathfinding algorythm.
Posted: 13 Nov 2006 22:55
by aarona
I'm not sure there is anything to discuss really.
Dynamic pathfinding is possible. Chris Sawyers problem was that he had to have a pathfinding routine that ran at 10fps (i think) on those "old" computers.
I think uzurpator was alone in this idea.
Maybe a quick poll is in order?
Posted: 13 Nov 2006 23:15
by Dave
I don't think Uzurpator's idea was any good at all.
If aarona's post was against, Uzy's, then I'm with him.
Posted: 15 Nov 2006 06:55
by XeryusTC
I haven't read Uzurpator's post, and if I did, I can't remember it anyway.
It is quite useless to think of a pathfinder before you have a method of laying track (and storing them), you could make a fancy tile-based pathfinder, but it would be totally useless if you aren't saving tracks tile-based.
Locked until the DD discussion arrives at this issue.